PL on the extraordinary call-up of GCMs in Jaguariaíva is removed from agenda for adjustments

The vote on Bill No. 31/2026 on the extraordinary convening of the Municipal Civil Guard of Jaguariaíva, which was scheduled to take place on Tuesday (27), in Câmara Municipal, was postponed. The information was confirmed by the mayor, Juca Sloboda.

He detailed that the project is being withdrawn from the agenda "to make the adequacy of the remuneration for the notice, there depends on financial resources. The draft will be forwarded to the House as soon as it is re-edited with the gratification of the special work regime."

The project

The summary of the project defines as objective "changes devices of Lei Municipal no. 3.103/2025, which disposes on the organization and operation of the Municipal Civil Guard of Jaguariaíva, to improve the disciplinary regime of the corporation, regulates the extraordinary convocation of its members and gives other measures".

The main point is Art. 56-A, which institutes the extraordinary convocation of members of the GCM for presentation to the service outside the ordinary scale.

The official text establishes that the summons has a strictly exceptional character and does not imply a permanent regime of notice, full availability or uninterrupted readiness of the server.

To be considered regular, the summons must meet 4 requirements:

1. Be based on the real and exceptional need of the public service, resulting from a supervening fact that compromises or may compromise the continuity, regularity or efficiency of public security;

2. be carried out by a competent authority;

3. be communicated by official or institutional electronic means suitable for proving the science of the server;

4. To be remunerated according to current municipal legislation, when appropriate, as an extraordinary service.

The project lists the hypotheses that may justify the summons, among others duly substantiated:

I - unexpected embezzlement of operational staff;

II - emergency situations;

III - public calamities;

IV - extraordinary events;

V - special operations;

VI - situations that represent a relevant risk to the community, municipal public services, goods, facilities or municipal public heritage.

The text expressly states that the summons may not be used as an ordinary instrument of composition of scale or as a permanent substitute for administrative planning of personnel.

Limitation of extra hours and punishment

The bill also amends Article 59. Today the law limits the extraordinary service to 02 (two) hours per day. With the new wording, this limit of 2 hours continues to apply to ordinary cases, but in the cases of Art. 56-A (extraordinary summons), the limit may exceptionally be exceeded by formal justification from the competent authority.

Another important change is the creation of item XXV in Art. 172, which considers disciplinary transgression: "to stop attending, without justifiable reason, formal summons for presentation to the service, emanating from the competent authority of the Municipal Civil Guard of Jaguariaíva and communicated by official or institutional electronic security capable of proving the science of the server, when destined to provide exceptional service or operational need justified due."

Art. 56-A itself, in its § 6, provides the guarantee that absence will only characterize disciplinary infraction when cumulatively demonstrated the regularity of the summons, the knowledge of the servant and the absence of a justifiable reason for the non-attendance.

COMPLETE REFORMULATION OF THE DISCIPLINARY REGIME

In addition to the summons, the project restructures the entire disciplinary regime of GCM.

Art. 174 proceeds to list as disciplinary penalties: I - warning; II - reprimand; III - suspension; IV - dismissal; V - cassation of retirement. The single paragraph establishes that penalties shall be applied according to the nature and severity of the offence, damage caused, aggravating and mitigating circumstances, functional antecedents and principles of proportionality, reasonableness and individualization of the penalty.

Section II-A - Of the Warning was added (Art. 182-A): the warning is consolidated as a penalty of a mild nature, with a pedagogical, corrective and preventive character, applied in cases of minor infractions. It will be applied in a reserved and written form by the Commander of the GCM and registered in the functional settlement.

The reprimand (Article 183) shall be applied in writing for average infringements, for non-observance of duties and functional prohibitions when no warning is due, and for recurrence of minor infringement within 6 months. If the server already sanctioned with reprimand commits a minor or average infraction again in 6 months, it will be subject to suspension. The penalty may be cumulative with a reeducation program.

The suspension (Art. 184) will be applied in cases of recidivism after reprimand, committing a serious infraction and unjustified refusal to submit to medical inspection. The penalty shall be in proportional loss of salary, absence for purposes of functional progression, disregard of the period for counting of effective exercise and loss of remuneration advantages. The suspension will be up to 10 days for recurrence, more than 10 days and will not exceed 90 days for serious infractions, and up to 15 days for refusal of medical inspection. In case of mild or medium recurrence with mitigating factors, the Commander may apply reprimand instead of suspension.

The project creates Section V - Participation in Reeducational Program as a Complementary Administrative Measure (Art. 185): participation in reeducational program constitutes a complementary administrative measure of a pedagogical, preventive, corrective, therapeutic or psychosocial character.

The text also defines competences: it will be up to the Mayor to apply resignation and dismissal of retirement; to the Commander of the GCM to apply warning, reprimand and suspension, and suspensions of more than 30 days require approval from the Mayor. The Standing Disciplinary Commission will be chaired by the Co-rector of the Municipal Civil Guard and will have a secretary appointed by the Municipal Secretary of Public Security, among effective servants of technical level equal or higher than that of the investigated servant.

JUSTIFICATION

In the justification annexed to the project, the City Council affirms that the typification of the unjustified refusal to the extraordinary summons as a serious violation is an indispensable measure to guarantee the continuity and efficiency of the security service, especially in exceptional situations.

It also claims that the proposal seeks to improve the legislative technique, reduce ambiguities, strengthen the individualization of the sanction, strengthen the pedagogical character of the warning and ensure greater proportionality, rationality and fairness in the application of sanctions, preserving institutional discipline and the guarantees of agents. According to the Executive, there is no increase in expenditure or budgetary repercussions.

The Bill comes into force on the date of its publication, if approved, and now awaits a new date for voting on the Câmara Municipal de Jaguariaíva.

Read also: After a day of strong rise, the dollar opens at R$ 5.39 on Tuesday